Friday, April 5th, 2013
This weekly news update provides the Government Resource Planning (GRP) community with a brief overview of recent FreeBalance developments and relevant industry news.
Good Practices in Cash Management for Developing Country Governments
We’re seeing increased interest in cash management among developing country governments. There are very few Public Financial Management (PFM) ‘best practices’ yet many good practices that are better depending on the country context. Government Resource Planning Systems (GRP), often called Government Integrated Financial Management Information Systems (IFMIS), are used to enable cash management. This good practice document identifies how GRP enables effective cash management.
Read the Cash Management Good Practice>>
How Procurement Portals Improve Governance
A government procurement portal is a platform that allows web users access to information on public spending, procurement procedures (bidding processes), tenders and awards. Users are able to access the bidding documents and review the tender process to ensure that all bidding vendors had equal opportunity in the bidding process. Procurement portal is an example concept in open government, where the public has direct and interactive access to government expenditure information.
Read the full article by Liza Benkovitch >>
Is Open Source disrupting the Enterprise Software market?
Doug Hadden attended the Open Analytics Summit in DC. The notion that open analytics, especially in the realm of big data, is disrupting the enterprise software market was a major underlying theme. Of course, the conference was dominated by open source vendors, so this may not come as a surprise to you. But, it is very clear that open source is disrupting the “soft underbelly” of the EnSw market: middleware.
Read more on the FreeBalance blog >>
Tags: cash management, middleware, procurement, treasury management
Posted in FreeBalance News, GRP, IFMIS, open source | No Comments »
Tuesday, March 19th, 2013
Doug Hadden, VP Products
We’re seeing increased interest in cash management among developing country governments. There are very few Public Financial Management (PFM) ‘best practices’ yet many good practices that are better depending on the country context.
Why is cash management important?

Effective cash management is enabled through effective budget formulation
What is cash management?
What are the differences between managing “cash” and “liquidity”
More developed countries make the distinction between cash management as a long-term planning and analysis function and liquidity management to ensure adequate cash is on hand. Short-term investments to ensure that there is effective use of the cash on hand are considered a treasury functionrather than a cash management function exercised through spending ministries.
How are GRP systems used to improve cash management?
- Systems are used to monitor and forecasts cash flow and financing requirements, and performs reconciliation between bank accounts and IFMIS records
- GRP systems support government cash receipt and payment functionality, cash flow forecasting and the management of government cash balances
- GRP systems leverage information and support variance reporting to enable identifying trend patterns.
- The more complex the information, the more there is a need for high-quality information systems. High-performing IT systems are needed to facilitate the preparation and updating of short-term cash projections and the maintaining databases of cash-flow trends. One option is to include a tailor-made cash forecasting module as part of an integrated financial management information system (IFMIS), with the accounting module of the IFMIS would provide data on inflows and outflows.
- Commitment accounting, used in GRP, provides early insight into cash requirements by tracking the commitment cycle of requisitions (soft commitments or pre-encumbrances), purchase orders (hard commitments, obligations or encumbrances), goods receipt and expense vouchers.
- Cash Management requires a mix of purely financial data, garnered from accounting systems and statements of managerial intention.
- In advanced countries, high-quality, timely, and comprehensive data on government cash transactions are usually readily available in the government’s accounting system, which is fully computerized.

What is the Treasury Single Account (TSA)?
A TSA can be defined as a unified structure of government bank accounts enabling consolidation and optimum utilization of government cash resources. It separates transaction- level control from overall cash management. In other words, a TSA is a bank account or a set of linked bank accounts through which the government transacts all its receipts and payments and gets a consolidated view of its cash position at the end of each day.
Why is the TSA critical to effectivecash management?
What problems do developing country governments face when implementing cash management?
What is the linkage between cash management and budget execution?
What are the characteristics of a good cash management system?
What are the stages to develop an effective cash management system in developing countries?
The sequencing of cash management functionality in developing country governments differs by context. Sequencing generally follows a pattern similar to this:
Stage 1: Addressing Fundamentals
Step 2: Forecasting capability
Step 3: Beyond prerequisites and basic cash planning
Step 4: Rough tuning and fine tuning
How is cash forecasting accomplished?
How can GRP systems improve cash management?
- GRP systems enable progressive activation enabling governments to sequence cash management functionality
- Support for electronic funds transfer and integration among ministries provides up-to-date liquidity information
- GRP systems support the migration to the TSA and numerous TSA methods
- Comprehensive transactional information enables the development of cash requirements, cash flow and aging reports
- Historical informationin GRP systems enable creating credible budgets using spending trend analysis
- Through the use of commitment accounting, GRP systems track the entire procurement cycle from requisitions enabling improved prediction of cash requirements
- Budget and commitmentcontrols can include warrants, or authorization to spend, over short periods of time based on cash forecasts
- Cash controlscan set thresholds to limit spending should there be reduced liquidity
- Workflowprocesses in GRP systems enable governments to adjust for temporary cash problems and alerts decision-makers on potential liquidity problems
What is a good practice approach to using GRP for good cash management?
- GRP software supports the use of the Treasury Single Account.
- GRP software provides the historical information necessary to make effective cash forecasting.
- GRP software provides budget planning and budget execution functionality to ensure creating credible budgets, managing against the budget and adjusting for cash availability.
- GRP software provides integration among revenue and expenditure systems including payment systems.
- GRP software can eliminate the poor practice of cash box budgeting.
Tags: cash controls, cash management, liquidity management, Treasury, treasury single account, TSA
Posted in GRP, IFMIS, PFM | No Comments »
Wednesday, October 28th, 2009
There are excellent sources for reading material on PFM and GRP coming from donor organizations. We’d like to highlight some of the best material from DFID, USAID, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Integrated Financial Management Information Systems A Practical Guide http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADK595.pdf
Review of Public Financial Management http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Documents/publications/evaluation/review-pub-finan-mgmt-reform-lit.pdf
World Bank Public Sector and Accountability Series:
IMF Fiscal Affairs Department Technical Notes
Tags: accounting standards, accrual accounting, accrual budgeting, budget classification, cash accounting, cash management, chart of accounts, combating corruption, commitment controls, expenditure prioritization, expenditure review, fiscal management, GFSM 2001, government acconting, government financial reporting, IMF, intergovernmental fiscal transfers, IPSASB, local governance, managing-for-results, participatory budgeting, performance budgeting, program budgeting, program classification, public expenditure management, public services delivery, world bank
Posted in IFMIS, implementation, modernization, performance, PFM, sustainability | No Comments »
Thursday, March 5th, 2009
This is section 2.1 of a series of blog entries creating a Government IFMIS Technology Evaluation Guide. This includes information to assist in evaluating IFMIS options and the technology requirements for FreeBalance IFMIS implementations. These series will be combined with feedback to produce a comprehensive Technology Evaluation Guide to be published on our web site.
Financial management differs between the private and public sectors. The practice of acquiring an Integrated Financial Management Information Systems (IFMIS) often begins with the context of private sector accounting or existing software in use. These approaches can often mislead prioritization.
FreeBalance has developed a PFM Component Map that enables governments to effectively determine functional needs and priorities. The FreeBalance PFM Component Map provides a high level view to government financial functions. It is a target for determining the characteristics of an IFMIS. Governments can identify which components are needed and the level of importance. Government can map current systems against the component map to determine gaps. It enables determining the needed portfolio for automation, reform and improvement. No one vendor can provide a comprehensive PFM solution for the broad range of needs in government and the variability in country contexts.
A component is a defined piece of functionality that could operate stand-alone. The FreeBalance PFM Component Map enables drilling into more levels of detail to identify rich functional requirements.It also provides components for transparency and citizen service. The arrangement and definition of components is government centric. The main functional components for the FreeBalance PFM Component Map are:
- Government Performance Management
- Budget Planning/Formulation
- Public Accounting and Budgetary Classification
- Aid Management and Harmonization
- Commitment and Budget Accounting
- Budget and Appropriation Control
- Commitment and Obligation Control
- Budget Execution and Funds Release
- Government Financial Management
- Reform and Modernization Activation
- (Treasury) General Ledger
- Project Accounting and Management
- Asset and Inventory Management assets and inventory management
- Treasury Management
- Debt and Investment Management
- Public Expenditure Management
- Grants Management and Intergovernmental Transfers
- Government Receipts Management and Revenue Administration
- Non Tax Government Revenue
- Civil Service Management
- Civil Service Workforce Management
The use of component maps to identify priorities has become a good practice, particularly in today’s age of Service-Oriented Architectures (SOA). The New Language of Business is an excellent guide to this technique.
The detailed PFM Component Map is available on a non-disclosure basis by contacting FreeBalance: dhadden@freebalance.com.
Tags: aid harmonization, aid management, appropriation, budget, budget execution, budget planning, cash management, civil service, commitment, controls, obligation, policy, procurement, receipts, revenue, service-oriented architecture, SOA, treasury management
Posted in capacity building, IFMIS, modernization, performance, PFM | No Comments »